Okay, so I had this sort of weird journal entry idea about MrEnter that I've wanted to write about for a little while. It's just some weird little observation I had. Okay, so here's a story that I think is a good illustration of two points I'd like to make:
1) MrEnter is not very good at criticising cartoons.
2) A lot of criticism of his criticism is also not very good.
Okay, so here's the story. Awhile back, I remember re-watching an old video - MrEnter's 'Animated Atrocities' review of the SpongeBob episode "Squid Baby." The plot is that SpongeBob and Patrick accidentally cause Squidward to get some sort of head trauma which causes him to revert to the mentality of a baby. At one point in the review, MrEnter criticizes the episode, going on what he jokingly calls a "Nerd Rant" about a joke where a doctor diagnoses Squidward with "Head-Go-Boom-Boom-itis."
Enter's issue with the joke is that he perceives it as an example of cartoons or people or whatever misusing the suffix "-itis" as a catchall for any sort of medical issue.
While scrolling through the comment section of this review, I came across a random comment where some dude took issue with Enter's criticism of that joke, defending it by saying some variation of the classic "it's just a joke" defense.
Of course, this is a meaningless defense of the joke. Simply pointing out that it's a joke doesn't mean the joke can't be criticized or whatever he was trying to say. But then something else occurred to me. Or to be fair another comment might have pointed this out and I'm misremembering. I'm really not sure.
But the thing that either occurred to me or someone else pointed was that there was another actual problem with Enter's criticism of the joke. And it seems so obvious looking. In "Squid Baby," Squidward's head was in fact inflamed. Squidward literally had Head-Go-Boom-Boom-itis.
Now to be clear, this isn't me harping on a minor point in an old review or harping on a random comment on some old review. This memory just stuck out to me as a perfect example of Enter's problems as a reviewer and the problems of a lot of his critics. But thankfully, nowadays, he gets a lot more constructive criticism than he used to.
And just FYI, I'm not jumping on any sort anti-MrEnter bandwagon here. I've had issues with his reviews pretty much ever since I started watching him. I think I always liked the idea of his reviews more than the reviews themselves. I unsubscribed from him around a year ago. The video that made me decide to unsubscribe was his review of that Sabrina episode. It wasn't even an awful review. There were a few good points. But there were enough bad points that made me decide that I just don't like his videos that much anymore. Me unsubscribing didn't have anything to do with Nick-O-Rama either. I actually liked the few reviews from it I watched. But I haven't seen a lot of the most infamous ones. And also, I unsubscribed before all the anti-mask crap.
Okay, that's all. See ya.